<chapter id="examples">
- <!-- $Id: examples.xml,v 1.21 2006-04-25 12:26:26 marc Exp $ -->
+ <!-- $Id: examples.xml,v 1.22 2006-07-03 12:30:24 sondberg Exp $ -->
<title>Example Configurations</title>
<sect1>
significantly because it ties searching semantics to the physical
structure of the searched records. You can't use the same search
specification to search two databases if their internal
- representations are different. Consider an different taxonomy
+ representations are different. Consider a different taxonomy
database in which the records have taxon names specified
inside a <literal><name></literal> element nested within a
<literal><identification></literal> element
said about implementation: in a given database, an access point
might be implemented as an index, a path into physical records, an
algorithm for interrogating relational tables or whatever works.
- The only important thing point is that the semantics of an access
- point are fixed and well defined.
+ The only important thing is that the semantics of an access
+ point is fixed and well defined.
</para>
<para>
For convenience, access points are gathered into <firstterm>attribute